CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2] — Page 251

A

10.

249

JO TC

Imag‚& relegat

AS IT HÄNy sựudli gus ni ngumu pozI9G A”

TAJU VII di de !

܀

'auno mod to pulvileiwl jiva, odvti ob

Du MOT.... De Ou ya Mawile... su

-6.ajnemeetja prone to sobi, ......3 294de bila "al ameique si s

,ɔa da due Bolsoul) or

'T

BAA VIE MATER

me ghiniteb studada ald deir tendey-

dat va io İsenya edes tomad to val elule sud ei zi (、edajů buBiVLA

TUOS Jedt om ni Devoth Bİ 24.3 BLITO TOVE ZLAVoo 3i dad dont end

DUILDS AUTO IavoidanOJAI OJ Til le el vi

.ba me bool VI y sub co. 4976 Bay JJMX And

Lon't evi. Di

3 .3

D MOV

MOJI UTİture ou do..

1 to owoTÍV ¿ú i Ina daw Temning dand ke-

bio. raw ed da dove the

en mat JITI W

to epoki

J0J60 17.

.*1 RI

Jow I oni

zan ni

ouri xem

ojuúy onï .abinoït to tortvo)

JİT: 190J0L 1 42 .HOVS V18m 25,

ANG BUTTS 91.. 997 @ qum stand id and m s7o Sub mar a muwi...00 9ld

.sounɛi si din nander erat

14.

+

Toot Ttire..z

+

0.

O TOLIOVer onl 992 Cİ Juttar a to spetiv La bi

Tevifol a damn. t co mắn (3À 105 1000 bhoose yISULE

ajadą, sud jieun tevi. .dtuk mal. To add and to CAD

"H01 vod od 20. VAIUL De ei die virou

Mar dud JRS

* Leib SDİTOľ

14

MOT L

LALU TE Jo jas U

quadro to "0,100Bio To. 50° HA WAJ BJBİBLİ unis IamwoQ*

tibbe son to Jootto

MALJ Dh006BA

pal, she

love en dad bra

A bojdinove ealcitowwwS RUOTEEN Sac beni xe

,ngood-vxus sid ni of berrotou aqəlido na

to ensure a simul sedadl maglia ni gand ALDOR LI 01A DUS -br 191 70 Juli zeleni MI: Joung sugroo aktoum & vi e':00 2

-ing to custody a prisoner is final, and a writ of error is allowed thereon, that the principle of res adjudicata is applicable, yet in none of these cases was the question of extradition involved.

X X.

.

*The courts in a Habeas Corpus proceeding of this kind, where the prisoner is arrested for extradition, cannot go into a trial of the merits of the cause. The proceeding is only an initiatory step to a trial in another State. As to the guilt

of the prisoner, they are not allowed to inquire. Their

judicial powers are limited to a determination on the

sufficiency of the papers and the identity of the prisoner. If the prisoner is discharged, it will not absolve him from being

re-arrested on a new warrant issued by the Governor. x X

Kurtz vs State

22 Florida Reports, p. 36.

DECISIONS OF FEDERAL COURTS.

X."

With reference to the following cases the remarks, on pages one and two supra, with regard to res adjudicata and the system of federal jurisprudence should also be borne in mind.

One Bassing was extradited from Rhode Island to lew York in Larch, 1907, for grand larceny, where arraigned and after one or two adjourn- -ments the complaint was dismissed on motion of the State for lack of proof to convict. He returned to Rhode Island without objection on the part of the State of New York. In July, 1907, another warrant of extradition was issued against him and he sued out a writ of Habeas Corpus alleging the above facts and that he was not a fugitive, having returned with the knowledge and consent of the State of New York.

Justice Harlas said:-

"The question arises on these facts whether the Governor of

Rhode Island was authorised by the Constitution and laws of the United States to issue a second warrant for the arrest of Bassing and his delivery to the agent of Hew York, such warrant being based upon a second indictment for the same offence as that charged in the former indictment. We have